Showing posts with label Apple. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Apple. Show all posts

Saturday, May 3, 2008

Will Apple Allow AT&T to Discount the iPhone?


Arik Hesseldahl from BusinessWeek in the article , "Why AT&T May Deep-Discount the iPhone."
With less than two months to go before Steve Jobs takes the stage at Apple's Worldwide Developers Conference, where he's expected to unveil a new iPhone, it appears that AT&T may not be convinced that new bells and whistles will be enough to get droves of new customers to switch from other wireless carriers. So after a year of charting a new wireless business model by selling the vaunted iPhone at premium prices, the nation's biggest phone company may resort to the oldest trick in the cellular book: big discounts.

Gruber from Daring Fireball seems to disagree with Hesseldahl's logic.
The problem is this: why would Apple allow AT&T to sell iPhones for half the price of what iPhones cost in Apple’s own stores (including this one)?

Subsidies only work when they’re sold in conjunction with two-year contracts. It’s possible that Apple could do the same, and sell subsidized AT&T-contract iPhones in Apple Stores, but that would mean abandoning the innovative (and very appealing, very successful) model of activating a new iPhone at home, via iTunes, rather than sitting around in a store for 45 minutes making uncomfortable small talk with a salesman while waiting for your credit check and your old phone number to transfer over.

You’d think this might be worth a mention.

From a financial aspect, Apple allowing deep discounting makes a lot of sense. The more wireless-plan contracts that AT&T can pick up, the more profit there is for Apple via revenue sharing. This is on top of the profit Apple makes on the sale of the hardware alone. A good percentage of the iPhones that Apple sells in its stores are bulked shipped around the world to places like Russia, which supposedly has amassed a market of 500,000 unlocked iPhones. These unlocked phones make Apple less money because they lost out on revenue sharing.

But the real problem with the deep discounting process is the customer experience, which is extremely important to Apple. To get a discounted phone, usually you have to sit with a rep in the store or on the phone as they take your credit card and have you sign the contracts, etc. Once the wireless plan is activated, then they charge you the discounted price for the phone and you walk out of the store with your new phone. I agree with Gruber: there's not a snowball's chance in hell Apple will allow this in Apple stores. And there's a bunch of reasons why Apple wants you take your iPhone home and activate it by hooking it up to iTunes. But, is it there a way Apple could maintain its retail customer service experience and still allow the discount?

Here's an idea: there are two seperate approaches for the $200 discount, one for AT&T stores and one for Apple stores.

In AT&T stores, a customer must suffer the pain of sitting in the store through the finance check and contract signing. At the end, customers can walk out of the store able to make phone calls with their $200 iPhone. But what about iTunes? Apple surely wants those users to connect to iTunes and buying all that media right? That's where the iPhone updates and the SDK comes in. People still have to connect it to iTunes if they want all that cool shit that's going to come out soon. Not to mention the iPhone is the "world's best iPod." Of course people are going to hook it to iTunes.

But with the Apple retail store shopping experience, nothing changes. You're still getting the same minimalist experience. You have to buy the iPhone at full price, and you can still ship it to Mother Russia or the Congo or wherever to be unlocked. Or, you can take it home, activate it, and AT&T cuts you a $200 credit to your account or a rebate check. I think the typical Apple shopper will forgo the instant discount for the convenience and coolness of shopping in the Apple store. The typical AT&T store shopper? Probably not.




Thursday, April 3, 2008

Tom Kravitz on Why Apple Won't Be Going With the Intel Silverthorne Platform


Tom Kravitz from CNET cuts through all the hype and tells why the Silverthorne (Atom) processor is not likely to be in an iPhone soon:
"I'll go out on a limb: Apple is not going to use this generation of Atom in the iPhone or iPod Touch. Atom is a good stepping stone for Intel's low-power design teams, but it's still an order of magnitude away from the power consumption goals Apple requires for those products. Come Moorestown in 2009 or 2010, maybe that's different, but we're not there yet."
I think the door is still left open for a tablet device though. People want a good battery life for their phone, not so much a portable computer.

Link to article.

Thursday, December 6, 2007

Fast Company: Open Season on Apple


Fast Company’s lastest cover story paints a picture of Apple in 2008 as a company under attack by numerous enemies.

“In a way the company has never seen, the barbarians are massing at the gates. From hardware to software to services, major competitors with serious R&D and marketing budgets are laying siege to the House of Jobs. As Apple moves into new markets, it has made powerful new enemies, some working in concert.”
I would argue that Apple is the one “massing at the gates.” Apple is seizing new territory from cell phone makers with its iPhone and gaining more ground in the computer market with its OSX and MacBooks. Nokia, Dell, and other companies in these matured markets have been forced into a defensive position. Take, for example, Nokia’s plan to release a touchscreen phone and Michael Dell’s recent promise to create “product lust,” an obvious attempt to copy Apple’s advertising savvy.

The only area in which Apple finds itself on the defensive is with the iPod. Its most deep-pocketed competitor, Microsoft, finally has a product that could seize ground in the contrarian market (people who will not buy an iPod no matter what), but Apple’s innovation has continued to outpace Microsoft and the rest of competition. Based on current product lines (including cell phones that play mp3s), there are no signs the iPod’s market size or market share will shrink in 2008.

In the near future, based on its current product profile, Apple seems unlikely to give ground in any of the markets it currently competes. In fact, Apple has plenty of market share to gain in two of its three core markets (OS/computers and cell phones). It also could be argued that the third market, mp3 players, will continue to grow in overall size as mp3 players begin to catch on in unsaturated markets globally (Asia).

For continued growth in 2008, Apple will need to focus on the affordability of its products and the openness and versatility of its products.

Sunday, October 28, 2007

Extended Fake Steve Jobs Interview video


Wallstrip's extremely cute Lindsay Campbell interviews Fake Steve Jobs.

Monday, October 22, 2007

iPhone and Salesforce.com?


The weirdest financial news from today's earnings release has got to be Apple working with Salesforce.com to improve the iPhone as a business-friendly device. From the Dow Jones ticker:

"Apple executives confirmed that business software maker Salesforce.com Inc. (CRM) is modifying its products for the iPhone."

It's not so interesting that Salesforce is trying to make its software compatible for the iPhone, but it is interesting that Apple executives saw fit to comment on it. I'm waiting for the transcript to see if reading it in context will make better sense. Perhaps an analyst baited the Apple executives into a sort of advertisement for Salesforce. In any case, if you didn't know, Salesforce is a growing competitor for Microsoft in the business software world.

Monday, May 14, 2007

You'll Be Waiting In Line for an iPhone


The news today is a memo AT&T Wireless has sent to their retail stores with instructions on how to handle questions regarding the iPhone. AppleInsider has the lowdown, as well as a picture of the actual memo.

Two pieces of information stand out to me. From the memo:

Sales for the iPhone will be on a first come, first served basis.

That means customers will be camping out at an Apple store or an AT&T Wireless store if they want an iPhone anytime soon. It also means iPhones will be selling on eBay for thousands of dollars.

The second juicy detail is the wording regarding the price of the iPhone. The memo instructs stores to tell people the "4gb will retail at $499 and the 8gb will retail $599." The use of the word retail here is clever and leaves the door open to subsidized pricing. Who has ever paid retail for a phone?

Even subsidized, the iPhone still will have to cost more than most iPods; more specifically, it has to cost more than a nano, Apple's bestseller. Why would customers buy an 8gb nano if they could get an iPhone cheaper? Apple may not want to cannibalize their iPod sales.

However, maybe they should go ahead and do it. After all, weren't there 1 billion phones sold last year compared to something like 130 million mp3 players?

Tuesday, May 8, 2007

Obstacle to the iPhone's Success: Can You Use It With One Hand?


Many people have criticized the iPhone without ever touching one. It's funny to note that most of the criticism focuses on things like the price of the phone (Steve Ballmer), or John C. Dvorak saying Apple can't survive the thin margins of the cell phone business. But what about the phone? Dvorak and Ballmer make no prediction whether people will like using the phone.

Let's focus on the functionality of the iPhone, because ultimately, that's where the battle will be waged. Apple can turn a profit on the device as long as it can sell a product that is better than any other of its kind. If they do that, they can follow luxury car companies and sell in smaller quantities for a lot more money.

Keeping Your Eyes on the Road

My first question for the iPhone is, can you use it with only one hand?

Picture yourself driving with your cell phone in your pocket. It rings. You know it's dangerous to talk on your phone while driving, buy you decide to answer anyway. Keeping one hand on the wheel, you reach your hand into your pocket, take out the phone, and with your thumb, you answer, either by flipping open the phone or by hitting the talk button. You do it without taking your eyes of the road. Will you be able to do all of this with the iPhone?

At 2007 MacWorld, Steve Jobs said making calls is the iPhone's killer app. That's making calls, not receiving. He never demoed receiving a call while the iPhone was not already in use. For the sake of discussion, let's call answering the iPhone from locked mode a cold call. The only reference to a cold call at 2007 MacWorld was when Jobs showed a slide of the iPhone as it presumably received a cold call. The slide showed two buttons on the iPhone, one to answer the call, one to ignore it. Would it be possible to hit those buttons with your thumb? Will the promixity sensor allow the button to be pushed if it detects your palm reaching across the phone?

Now, let's take a step back to my scenario of answering the phone while you're driving. The iPhone is in your pocket and it starts ringing. Without taking your eyes off the road, you take it out of the pocket and attempt to answer the call.

Can you tell which part of the phone is the top, and which is the bottom?

Assuming you know which way is up, how do you know--eyes on the road now-- you are hitting the correct button? The screen is smooth--there is no tactile feedback or any other distinguishing feature. Will our motor memories be enough to know which section of the screen to push?